Is there a right to remain silent? : coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 / Alan M. Dershowitz.
Material type:
TextSeries: Inalienable rights seriesPublication details: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2008.Description: xx, 212 p. ; 22 cmISBN: - 9780195307795 (hardback : alk. paper)
- 0195307798 (hardback : alk. paper)
- 345.73/056
- KF 9668 D438i 2008
| Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Vol info | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Libro
|
Biblioteca Juan Bosch | Biblioteca Juan Bosch | Ciencias Sociales | Ciencias Sociales (3er. Piso) | KF 9668 D438i 2008 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | 1 | Available | 00000113626 |
Browsing Biblioteca Juan Bosch shelves, Shelving location: Ciencias Sociales (3er. Piso), Collection: Ciencias Sociales Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
| KF 9625 S634c 2007 Criminal procedure : regulation of police investigation : legal, historical, empirical, and comparative materials / | KF9630 W582c 2008 Criminal procedure : constitutional constraints upon investigation and proof / | KF 9656 H847 2013 How can you represent those people? / | KF 9668 D438i 2008 Is there a right to remain silent? : coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 / | KF 9673 C388j 1995 Jeopardy in the courtroom : a scientific analysis of children's testimony / | KF 9728 B256j 2025 Justice abandoned : how the Supreme Court ignored the Constitution and enabled mass incarceration / | KF 9756 G228c 2010 Criminal evidence : principles and cases / |
Includes bibliographical references (p. [177]-204) and index.
What is the right against self-incrimination? -- The Supreme Court's recent decision -- The limits of textual analysis in constitutional interpretation -- The limits of precedent: which way does the "immunity" analogy cut? -- The limits of historical inquiry -- The privilege over time -- The relevance of constitutional policies underlying the right -- A matter of interpretation -- Conclusion: The case for a vibrant privilege in the preventive state.
There are no comments on this title.