000			03527cam a2200481 i 4500
999			_c118165 _d118165
001			21346841
003			BJBSDDR
005			20230411090901.0
006			a|||||r|||| 00| 0
007			ta
008			191228s2020 nyua b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2019043044
020			_a9780231180870 (softcover ; acid-free paper)
020			_a023118087X (softcover ; acid-free paper)
020			_z9780231543309 _q(ebook)
040			_aLBSOR/DLC _beng _cDLC _erda _dDLC
041			_aeng
042			_apcc
050	1	4	_aPN 1995 _bK29a 2020
082	0	0	_a791.4301/5
100	1		_aKeller, Sarah _q(Sarah K.) _926501
245	1	0	_aAnxious cinephilia : _bpleasure and peril at the movies / _cSarah Keller.
264		1	_aNew York : _bColumbia University Press, _c2020.
300			_aviii, 301 pages : _billustrations ; _c23 cm.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aFilm and culture
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 269-278) and index.
505	0		_aArdor and anxiety : the history of cinephilia -- Enchanting images -- Cinephilia and technology : anxiety and obsolescence -- The exquisite apocalypse -- Conclusion : anxious times, anxious cinema.
520			_a"The digital revolution in contemporary movie-making has engendered a wave of cinephilia among those nostalgic for the culture of cinema and the medium of film. It has also spawned growing concerns about their future. The concept of cinephilia, Keller argues, is hardly new as technological revolutions have always brought out similar reactions in the face of change and a sense of passing (the advent of sound from silent films, color, etc.). In Anxious Cinephilia, Keller looks back at the history of cinephilia from avant-garde filmmakers in the beginning of the twentieth century to the French New Wave's love of Humphrey Bogart to contemporary critics celebrating their love of cinema. She also considers the ways in which cinephilia has embraced some of the democratic/utopic aspects of the digital revolution such as Youtube and the proliferation of GIFs. Tied to cinephilia has been the concept of cinephobia, which has centered on three interrelated areas: anxieties about being captured on film (surveillance, unattractive footage of oneself, cinema's soul-stealing dangers), anxieties about cinema's deleterious influence on audiences; and anxieties about the medium itself. Keller demonstrates that a recognition of the reciprocal relationship between cinephilia and anxiety allows an entry point into understanding the current digital revolution and the history of film. Keller examines the ways in which films have depicted or thematized anxious cinephilia as well as considering audience and critical reactions to cinema and changes in film technology and culture"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		0	_aMotion pictures _xAppreciation.
650		4	_aCine _xApreciación _94721
650		0	_aMotion pictures _xPsychological aspects.
650		4	_aCine _xAspectos psicológicos. _91235
650		0	_aMotion pictures _xHistory.
650		4	_aCine _xHistoria _91515
776	0	8	_iOnline version: _aKeller, Sarah (Sarah K.) _tAnxious cinephilia. _dNew York : Columbia University Press, [2020] _z9780231543309 _w(DLC) 2019043045
830		0	_923740 _aFilm and culture series
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _cBK