000 02680nam a22002537a 4500
003 BJBSDDR
005 20260107173019.0
006 a|||||r|||| 00| 0
007 ta
008 260107s2016 enk|||||r|||| 00| 0 eng d
020 _a9781107121058
040 _bspa
_cBJBSDDR
041 _aeng
050 _bC314d 2016
100 1 _aCarrese, Paul O.
_946575
245 1 0 _aDemocracy in moderation :
_bMontesquieu, Tocqueville, and sustainable liberalism /
_cPaul Carrese.
250 _afirst edition
260 _a Cambridge, England :
_bCambridge University Press,
_c2016
300 _a230 pages :
_billustrations ;
_c24 cm
505 _aContenidos : Preface (pages ix–xiv) Prologue: The Spirit of Moderation in Constitutional Democracy (pp. 1–16) Part I: Tocquevillean Moderation in Philosophy and Founding Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Moderation: Natural Right, Liberalism, Constitutionalism (pp. 22–49) Washington’s Harmony: The Balance of Traditions in the American Founding (pp. 50–77) Tocqueville’s Deepening of Modern Moderation (pp. 78–104) Part II: Moderation and Statesmanship, at Home and Abroad Religion and Liberty in America: The Moderate Spirit of Montesquieu and Tocqueville (pp. 109–142) Moderation, American Grand Strategy, and Washington’s Statesmanship (pp. 143–172) Constitutionalist Political Science: Storing’s Moderation and Our Polarization (pp. 173–198) Epilogue: Moderation and Sustainability (pp. 199–203) Bibliography (pp. 204–224) Index (pp. 225–230)
520 _aDemocracy in Moderation argues that political moderation is a foundational but often overlooked principle of constitutional liberal democracy. Paul O. Carrese examines how two major thinkers—Montesquieu and Alexis de Tocqueville—developed moderation as a practical and moral guide for sustaining free political systems. Carrese contends that modern liberal democracies face dangers from ideological extremism, polarization, and moral absolutism, which weaken institutions and civic trust. By revisiting Montesquieu’s theory of separation of powers and Tocqueville’s analysis of democracy in America, the book shows how moderation balances liberty and equality, freedom and order, religion and politics. Rather than promoting passivity or centrism, moderation is presented as an active constitutional virtue—one that requires prudence, restraint, and institutional design to channel democratic energies productively. The book ultimately proposes moderation as essential for the long-term sustainability of liberal democracy, especially in pluralistic societies.
942 _2lcc
_n0
_cBK
946 _illh
999 _c126203
_d126203